DATASET
Species_point_data.csv (237.97 kB)
DATASET
species_env_layers.csv (2.26 kB)
DATASET
species_env_layers_pca_p.csv (2.37 kB)
ARCHIVE
environmental_data.zip (464.41 MB)
ARCHIVE
target group background files.zip (3.86 MB)
ARCHIVE
bias_grids.zip (109.62 MB)
ARCHIVE
cross_validations.zip (11.31 kB)
DATASET
correlation.csv (23.51 kB)
DATASET
kulczynski.csv (23.65 kB)
ARCHIVE
priority_rankings.zip (924 MB)
DATASET
abs.diff.ranks.combined.csv (1.39 kB)
ARCHIVE
overlaps.zip (3.21 kB)
TEXT
Muscatello_code_forWeb.R (52.04 kB)
1/0
Muscatello et al. (2020) How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes - data and code
dataset
posted on 2020-12-21, 06:35 authored by Angela MuscatelloAngela Muscatello, ROSEMARY ELITHROSEMARY ELITH, HEINI KUJALAInput data, results and code used in the article Muscatello et al. (2021) "How decisions
about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes".
The species data are originally sourced from the Atlas of Living Australia (https://www.ala.org.au/) and BioNet (http://www.bionet.nsw.gov.au/). These and the environmental layers are a subset of data cleaned and collated by Kujala et al. (2015) (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.017). We thank A. Whitehead, who compiled the original species data records and environmental variables.
Please cite this paper when using data or code from this repository:
Muscatello, A., Elith, J. & Kujala, H. (2021) How decisions
about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes. Conservation Biology, DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13669.
