The University of Melbourne
Browse

<b>In Critique of Repair: </b>A Localised Case Study of irrepairable damage by "Cleanfill Tipping" in Melbourne's Green Wedge and Reflections for Practice

Download (1.67 MB)
Version 4 2025-09-19, 02:02
Version 3 2025-09-03, 21:38
Version 2 2025-09-03, 05:47
Version 1 2025-09-03, 05:21
preprint
posted on 2025-09-19, 02:02 authored by SARAH HUNTERSARAH HUNTER
<h2>In Critique of Repair: A Localised Case study and Reflections for Practice</h2><p dir="ltr">This piece was first written in response to a provocation on the on notion of repair. “Repair’ was, it was suggested, a nuanced approach to architectural design in the 21st century”, a positive response to an observation that ‘our capitalist economy presents a commercial incentive to raze and abandon,’</p><p dir="ltr">Taking a landscape and environmental perspective, I suggest in this that “repair” should not be seen as a benign salve to the ills of damage. Although ‘Repair’ can play a legitimate and crucial role in the face of degradation of the built and natural environment, the act of repair, with synonyms of “patch up”, “mend” and “get working again”<a href="#_edn1" target="_blank">[i]</a> should be a response (only) to historical ills or unforeseen disaster. Too often in contemporary projects a program which includes damage to the built or natural environment is proposed with ‘repair’, ‘restoration’, or ‘mitigation’ of on- or off- site impacts an acknowledged, but incompletely conceived (or completely unconceived), stage of the process of development.</p><p dir="ltr">In many cases, built environment professionals are expected to mitigate problems created by their lack of involvement at the early stages of design. A notional ‘repair’ stage not be allowed to reduce the requirement to achieve good design outcome at the outset. A lighter, more conscious approach to design is appropriate to achieve sustainability, quality and distinctive design.</p><p dir="ltr">This piece takes a personal, place based case study of commercial “clean fill” tipping impacting my farm in the shire of Nillumbik, in Melbourne’s Green wedge. In addition to exploring the painful story of attempting to stop the tipping, I look at the source of the fill, most likely the greenfields housing development sites in Melbourne's burgeoning growth areas to the north of the CBD, and consider how better design solutions with the early involvement of built environment professionals could result in a better outcome altogether.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>

History

Add to Elements

  • Yes